The Possible Protective Effects of Ondansetron and Tropisetron on Optic Nerve Crush Injury in Rats.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the potential neuroprotective effect of cyclosporine - a calcineurin inhibitor-, ondansetron, and tropisetron-5-hydroxytryptamine (serotonin) 3 receptor (5-HT3R) antagonists-, on optic nerve crush (ONC) injury in rats. Moreover, underlying signaling activities of their beneficial neuroprotective effects were studied. METHODS: Adult male rats were treated with the intravitreal administration of cyclosporine (1.6 mM), ondansetron (100 nM), and tropisetron (100 nM) immediately after the induction of ONC. Subsequently, on 7th day after surgery, the rats' retinas were extracted, and the expression of apoptotic regulators (Bax and Bcl-2) and calcineurin were studied by western blot analysis. RESULTS: The induction of ONC injury was associated to higher expression of Bax and calcineurin, while Bcl-2 expression was considerably decreased in these animals. Intravitreal treatment with cyclosporine (1.6 mM), ondansetron (100 nM), and tropisetron (100 nM) significantly attenuated the increased expression of Bax and calcineurin. Moreover, the treatment with these agents resulted in an elevated expression of Bcl-2 in the retina. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that cyclosporine, ondansetron, and tropisetron protect against ONC injury in rats, possibly via the suppression of apoptosis and modulation of calcineurin activity directly and via 5-HT3 receptors. Moreover, immunoblotting showed that tropisetron was more effective as opposed to ondansetron. Further studies are needed to evaluate the precise mechanism behind cyclosporine, ondansetron, and tropisetron activities.

Dapsone Protects Against Lithium-Pilocarpine-Induced Status Epilepticus in Rats through Targeting Tumor Necrosis Factor-α and Nitrergic Pathway.

Background and Purpose: Status epilepticus (SE) results in permanent neuronal brain damage in the central nervous system. One of the complex etiologies underlying SE pathogenesis is neuroinflammation. Dapsone has been recently considered as a potential neuroprotective agent in neuroinflammatory conditions. Therefore, the present study aims to investigate effects of dapsone on lithium-pilocarpine-induced SE in rats and assess whether tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) and nitric oxide (NO) pathway participate in this effect. Methods: SE was established by injecting lithium chloride (127 mg/kg, intraperitoneally [i.p.]) and pilocarpine (60 mg/kg, i.p.). The animals received pre-treatment dapsone (2, 5, 10, and 20 mg/kg, oral gavage) and post-treatment dapsone (10 mg/kg). Subsequently, seizure score and mortality rate were documented. To assess the underlying signaling pathway, L-Nω-Nitro-L-arginine methyl ester hydrochloride (a non-specific NO synthase [NOS] inhibitor), 7-nitroindazole (a specific neuronal NOS inhibitor), and aminoguanidine (a specific inducible NOS inhibitor) were administered 15 minutes before dapsone (10 mg/kg) pre- or post-treatment. Hippocampal tissue TNF-α and NO concentrations were quantified using the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay method. Results: Dapsone (10 mg/kg) pre-and post-treatment significantly attenuated the increased seizure score and mortality rate due to lithium-pilocarpine-induced SE. The development of SE in animals was associated with higher TNF-α and NO metabolites levels, which notably decreased in the dapsone-treated rats. Moreover, co-administration of NOS inhibitors with dapsone markedly reversed the anti-epileptic effects of dapsone and caused an escalation in TNF-α level but a significant reduction in NO concentration level. Conclusions: It seems that dapsone may exert an anti-epileptic effect on lithium-pilocarpine-induced SE through TNF-α inhibition and modulation of the nitrergic pathway.